Mashed Articles

Congratulations to Irish eLearning Company Aurion Learning and their client, the Family Planning Association (FPA), for winning a prestigious eLearning Age Award!

Aurion designed a groundbreaking sexual health and well-being e-learning programme for people with learning disabilities. Having spoken with Fiona Quigley throughout the development of this programme, I know that the challenges the whole team faced when producing such a great piece of learning. It’s a masterpiece of tone, timing and delivery – and deserving winner of the ‘Excellence in the production of learning content’ category.

I’m really delighted for Fiona Quigley, who is Director of Learning and Innovation at Aurion. Fiona’s one of my favourite girl geeks – one of few people I know who is keen to meet up of an evening and talk e-learning for a few hours. However, I’m sure the awards ceremony at the Park Lane Hotel in London’s Mayfair was a bit more glamorous than our meet-ups in the Errigal Inn, on the Ormeau road in Belfast.

You can buy a copy of the programme from the FPA’s website and you can see a demo of on Aurion’s website.

Get more details on the Awards ceremony here.

Alanna Mitchell asks the big question in this article.

So is school

- for the transmission of culture and potted knowledge, akin to filling a CD-ROM?
- for fostering skills that will serve society down the road, or make dutiful employees?
- a strategy to make sure a nation’s gross domestic product keeps rising?
- a sorting mechanism aimed at working out where in the class system a student ought to land?
- a way to encourage upward mobility?

She asks if school should it build character or endow morals? Is it a way for the new generation to question the values of the old? Or is it for making sure they don’t?

As Mitchell rightfully points out, you could write a library full of books on this stuff. However, 2 issues stand out to me as big red flashing signals alerting us that a schools’ reform is necessary:

1 Neuroscientific findings shows that the brain learns – or forms strong neural connections – when a child is in a calm, emotionally regulated state.

2 Neuroscience also shows that the brain is a platform on which intelligence can be built, rather than the determinant of a fixed intelligence.

I feel many schools fail on the first point, most particularly when children are taken from the much smaller, intimate primary school setting to an overcrowded secondary school.

As for the second point, it seems to me that education hasn’t changed much from my days at primary school, where the emphasis was on figuring out who was ‘brainy’ and who was ‘thick’ and streaming us accordingly. While being streamed into the ‘brainy’ group worked for me and kept me from being bored at school, I’m not so sure it was so great for the children in the ‘remedial’ stream. Maybe the problem was that the kids in remedial seemed to believe that’s where they’d be for life – not just for short-term special support in a specific area.

Mitchell quotes Guy Claxton, a psychologist at the University of Winchester in England, who argues that the brain as an organ is expandable, something to improve rather than prove, In theory, schooling should help that expansion happen. I don’t think the system encourages this.

Read the article here.

So progressive Danish schools are doing what nobody else is doing – letting their kids take their exams using the Internet.

Check out the BBC’s report for the full story – but here’s a couple of things that grabbed my attention:

Will the students cheat? There’s little stopping the students emailing each other for answers. But the teachers think the nature of the questions make it harder to cheat. Students aren’t asked to regurgitate facts and figures – they’re tested on their ability to sift through and analyse information.

According the the Danish Minister for Education, Bertel Haarder, Exams with Internet are an attempt to reflect daily life. He’s proud that Denmark is leading the way, and hopes (bless him) other countries will adopt this system.

Have to say, I’m 100% behind Stephen Heppell, professor of new media environments at Bournemouth University who wants UK exams to be updated.

“Then they go into the exam room and all [their technology is] taken away and they’re given a fountain pen and a sheet of lines paper and a three hour time limit. It’s time to get real, isn’t it?”

Paper exams felt out of date when I was sitting my GCSEs in 1993. What must it feel like now???

PS I found the cool legogeek image on David Muir’s EdCompBlog.

While in Amsterdam for the Maemo Summit 2009, I met up with Marina Tognetti, founder and CEO of Myngle.com

Myngle.com is a global language platform, where teachers and students from all over the world can teach and learn new languages. Myngle launched in December 2007. As of autumn 2009, it covers 51 languages with over 300 teachers and has 36000+ users from 162 countries.

Marina, an Italian who loves learning new languages, studied business and economics in Italy and then got strong corporate experience with stints at Proctor and Gamble, Philips and Sara-Lee. She left her role in eBay to create ‘an eBay for languages.’ She believes that everybody should have a chance to learn any language, no matter where they are located.

And Myngle does just this. Any student can learn any language online with live classes and real teachers. All teachers are carefully selected and trained by Myngle.

So how does Myngle work? Well, the student is king. You choose your teacher, your lesson time and price. You can try before you buy with a free trial. After that, you buy a learning package. You can opt for individual lessons or group.

Myngle was born while Marina was working for ebay – she’d been trying to learn Chinese. She’d been to school for 3 months for 2 hours a week, in a class of 25 learners. It just didn’t work. But private lessons didn’t work either – Marina had to select teachers by trial and error – unlike ebay, where you know what you’re getting, and the feedback is recorded.

Marina believes you really need a person to interact – to learn and correct. You don’t learn in a normal exchange. She believes your teacher will push you in one-to-one interaction. However, Myngle teachers adapt to your needs – if you like to learn by focussing on grammar rules, they’ll work with you on that.

Myngle is very selective when choosing teachers. Anyone can apply, however, teachers are personally screened – and Myngle guarantees that every one of their 300 teachers is good. All Myngle teachers have great experience in offline and online teaching.

Marina explained to me that Myngle students tend to be older and more serious than your average social learning network student. They’re often learning for business purposes. They’re spending money and want results – language learning is a serious investment for them.

Myngle’s try before you buy approach is really working for the website – according to Marina, a huge majority of those who try, buy. They love the service. But then Marina’s philosophy on customer service is to ‘always overdeliver’.

Myngle was started up with Marina’s personal finance. It has since secured two rounds of funding, and is in the process of securing a third. Marina and her team spent 2008 getting the site features just right and ensuring quality would be high. They spent 2009 focussing on marketing and customer service. 2010 will be all about the customer – reaching out to as many more language learners as Myngle can.

Interestingly, Marina observed that ‘Education is the only non-consumer centred industry in the world’. She believes this is wrong – and indeed can explain many of the educational failures we experience. She believes that the education sector is changing. The customer is taking control. They can now choose the teacher, method of learner, the time and place.

This approach leads the learner to eventually only needing an independent assessment as a means of certifying the learners knowledge – Donald Clarke has an interesting post on that here.

I’ll be testing Myngle out while I’m in Paris – I’ll review how I found their system.

You can follow Myngle on twitter @myngler

That’s the title of a BBC article telling the story of 16 year old Babar Ali – the world’s youngest headteacher. Every day, he teaches hundreds of students in the village of Murshidabad in West Bengal.

Babar is a student himself. Every morning, before school, he has to help with household chores. Then he catches an auto-rickshaw to travel part of the way to school. He walks the last mile or so.

Babar’s school is free, but his family have to pay for a uniform, books and transport – which all adds up to £25 a year. This is £25 too much for a lot of families.

After Babar finishes his school day, he comes back to his small village, and teaches what he has learned to 800 children who are too poor to afford the school fees. Babar is not alone. Ten teachers have joined him – students like himself – to teach what they know to other children.

This is an awesome story. Children who are hungry for knowledge feeding what they know to those who are even more deprived than they are.

But the title of the article is misleading. Children across the world are not hungry to learn. Time and again I’ve heard teachers comment that their biggest problem is in motivating students to want to learn.

Seeing as motivation is one of the key factors in effective learning, this is a worrying problem. So what is it about the kids in our schools? Why aren’t they hungry for knowledge? Is it because they live 24/7/365 in the middle of an information feast, and they’re gorged to the point of indifference?