Mashed Articles

Despite being an open-source stalwart, I’m ashamed to admit that I’ve always had something of a love-hate relationship with Apple. In the ’80s, I owned – and still do own – an original Apple IIe along with a real hard drive and two 5.25in floppy drives. It was inherited from the video shop that I worked in, and I put it and its immense customer database to all kinds of nefarious uses. But eventually I moved on to the upland pastures of colour displays, 880kB of storage on a 3.5in disk and four-channel sound. All thanks to Commodore.

In the ’90s, Apple’s expensive and closed hardware meant that an upgrade was never on the cards. This was now the world of Windows, of cheap hardware and modular upgrades. It was the time when Microsoft solidified its dominance, and the time that many of us were looking for a more open alternative. Developing applications on Windows was expensive, especially if you wanted to share the source code. That left us with only one option: Linux. And I’ve never looked back.

But I’ve continued to follow, and occasionally invest in, the progress of Apple, especially in recent years. The move to Intel and a BSD-based operating system has made OS X eminently more hackable, and Linux-
based open-source applications are far easier to build and port to OS X than they are to Windows. This has helped make the venerable MacBook Pro one of the most common laptops in use at open-source and Linux conventions, despite Apple’s obsessive control of the hardware. Apple, for many, has become an acceptable compromise for those who believe in free software but still want a machine that can resume from hibernation without the need to build a custom kernel.

But it’s the iPhone, and now the iPad, that has built a brick wall of division between what most of us are willing to ignore, and what Apple hopes will become their ultimate cash cow. Both are the result of a singular, draconian vision, the antithesis of what the open-source community represents. This isn’t a bad thing in itself, especially when the results leave a lot of free software products wanting. The interfaces of iPhone apps tend to be refined, simple and intuitive. The apps are consistent, responsive and cheap. Our parents could use an iPad without fear of viruses, malware and updates. For almost all the same reasons I’ve been telling them to switch to Linux, they can now switch to Apple for about the same cost.

But doing so is a pact with the devil, because you’re forgoing technical complexity in exchange for loss of freedom. This is the reason for Richard Stallman’s GNU manifesto. And while there’s little doubt that Apple’s enforced gateway to new applications has helped to make it a success, it’s this subtle trade of simplicity for complicity that is perhaps the biggest threat to free software in 10 years.

My fears were proven when Apple recently changed clauses 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 in its developer’s agreement, stopping programmers linking to third-party APIs. Its motivation may have been to halt apps using Adobe’s new Flash-based building tools, but it could also stop applications using open source-based frameworks such as MonoTouch and SDL. Apple refuses to clarify what will and will not be allowed through its vetting procedure. Presumably Electronic Arts games will still be allowed to use the LUA scripting engine, for example, while many independent developers aren’t going to know whether their approach is acceptable until they submit their app for review.

This type of business plan shows the very worst of what closed-source development has to offer, and exactly what open-source software blossomed to combat. But we can’t fight it with rhetoric and positive spin while our hardware and applications aren’t as good as those from closed systems. Public development and public scrutiny should lead to a better, more usable and more stable product. It worked for Linux servers and desktops, but it hasn’t worked for mobile devices yet. This is the challenge for free software developers.

It’s going to be tough, but this point in time probably marks the biggest opportunity for free software to prove its worth. It’s going to be a simple battle between closed, proprietary development on a single platform, and open innovation on open hardware. Open-source developers need to rise to the challenge or face a future that will be closed to collaboration, community and conscience.

Derive Important Information Through Data Process Outsourcing By: Jack Morkel

Data process outsourcing is one of the most important and most exclusive functional ability of call center. This marketing activity needs lots of planning, expertise in executives, loads of hard-work and the right business treatment of the compiled data.

Data process outsourcing requires proper time management along with data collection, data compilation, data sorting, data conversion and finally data processing for the right conclusion.

A call center takes privilege in outsourcing information processing through better quality, on time output, 24/7 customer support and similar other activities.

Data process outsourcing is collecting the right data converting data to make it useful, informative and meaningful for client. There are various tools to collect data. These include forms, surveys, market research, etc. The call center allots its executives to fill-up the form from prescribed customer data-base, telephonically or through personal meetings. Some Call centers email the prescribed form on the emailed of the prospective customers to get the filled form in due course of time. This is a risky affair as people may find this activity as intrusion in their privacy. So the former options are best for data collection.

The next step involves data compilation. It takes time to compile the data in proper form. All the forms are checked and rechecked for filling and then compiled into proper data. This is a strenuous exercise and sometimes takes lot of time as well. Call centers opt for computer support when survey is done telephonically.

Data process outsourcing is useful to small Companies also along with large Companies and it is always more efficient and more economical to get data process outsourcing from reputed call center. Moreover call centers are service-specialists also.

Data is compiled and sorted in the best possible way for best returns. The compiled data is processed through business analysts and this is the most difficult job as it needs understanding of the complied data and deriving the best inference out of it. The clients’ further plans are based on data process outsourcing; therefore, there shouldn’t be any mistake, at all.

Data process outsourcing is an exclusive activity done by select call centers for best results to their client.

About the Author

Jack Morkel is well known author has written article on Collection Call Center, Bpo Companies, Inbound Process, Lead Generation services and many other subjects.

(ArticlesBase SC #1975317)

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/ – Derive Important Information Through Data Process Outsourcing

What is Data Entry?

Data entry is the process of entering in various forms of data into an electronic format normally through a computer. As the world continues to advance in technology, more and more businesses are transitioning from the old school way of manual data management to relying on computers to empower these operational needs. Data entry services provide businesses the ability to transfer data from physical paper form into various electronic formats which then can be easily accessed through a computer. Among the different types of data management solutions businesses seek include inventory management, customer database management and sales record management, just to name a few.

Why outsource?

Data entry can be a very tedious and time consuming process. Many businesses today just do not have the time and budget to support such a tedious yet crucial process. Outsourcing your needs will not only save you on the cost of hiring employees internally, it will also help increase productivity. Most outsourcing companies have hundreds of operators and have the capability to run at full production capacity. Most companies just cannot support this if they hired internally. Turn around times can increase by as much as 300% by outsourcing your data entry needs and reduce cost up to 75% of normal domestic salary cost.

What to look for in an outsourcing company?

Probably the biggest concern with outsourcing your internal business processes is the quality of the services provided. When looking for a partner company to outsource to, make sure you choose a company with vast expertise and experience. Ask for previous clients they have worked with and ask for samples. A company that has been in the industry longer will have the resources and experience to provide you with a higher level of quality service.

Another concern of outsourcing is communication. Most outsourcing companies are located abroad in various parts of Asia and in different time zones. Communication problems could arise if you do not choose a company that has a process in place to deal with this. Some things to look out for are the availability of direct phone numbers, instant messaging support, and direct emails.

Below are some terms to know when dealing with data entry services:

Data Entry - The process of entering data into a database.

Data mining - The process of extracting data by discovering particular patterns in how the data is presented.

Data Processing - The process of processing or converting data from an original form into an electronic format.

To read more tips on Data Entry Services, go to http://www.mindreachconsulting.com

Article Source: http://ezinearticles.com/